Cinderella story, out of nowhere, former greenskeeper, now about to become a Masters champion..... It looks like a mirac.. It's in the hole! It's in the hole!
Well that was a fun watch!?
72 hole stroke play shits me.
I may be an outlier but matchplay at pro level is much more interesting!
Gamers
Ping G430 LST 9* Driver with CB55 stiff flex shaft
TM Stealth 2+ 3 wood with Crazy Boron 75g Stiff shaft
TM Stealth 2 Hybrid with Nemeses 90 M4 stiff shaft
Srixon ZX 5 (mk2) irons with Proj X LZ 5.5 shafts 4 to PW
Callaway MD5 Raw wedges 50/10 56/14 60/12
Lajosi Custum Flow Neck putter *Titty Pro V1X ball.
I'm not a fan of De Shampoo, but you have to hand it to him, he was steady the whole tournament.
Watching some coverage on the US Open app this morning, the commentators were suggesting that being a muscle-bound gorilla was potentially the new norm, as the length Bryson has off the tee, just gives him too much of an advantage.
This, IMO, is a complete knee jerk reaction. Every golfer has their day and today was Bryson's. This doesn't mean that the tour needs to change courses, because the Hulk is playing. He may go out and miss the cut in his next tournament.
When Tiger streaked the field and won by plenty, it didn't mean that courses needed to be set up more difficult. He is just a once in a generation player.
Srixon 565 - 10.5 deg stiff Miyazaki
Srixon 565 - 15 deg stiff Miyazaki
Srixon H45 - 90gr Stiff Whiteboard
Fourteen DI w/ SPB Stiff
Bridgestone J15CB 4-PW SPB's Stiff
Fourteen MT28 TS Spec 53 & 58 DG Spinner
Piretti Cortino
GOLF Link
BENCH
Drivers/Fairways/Hybrids
Yamaha v202 9.5* - Tourspec x flex
Sonartec SS-03
V Steel 3wd
V Steel 4wd Attas T3 8x
Titleist 585h 19*
Irons
Mizuno MP33 3-P
Putters
Ping Anser, Anser 2, Scottsdale
Wedges
Cleveland 54
Fourteen 48
Agree chappy, they didn't need to lengthen and toughen the courses, bit they did. And here we are, where length is needed to really compete. It's become a driver's game.
Not saying short hitters don't compete BUT they are at a massive disadvantage.
When when the rough is thick, it's easier to hit a wedge from it than a 7 iron. Playing into the hands of the longer hitters.
RM showed that good design doesn't have to be long. But American courses rely on the thick rough around the greens, where run off short grass is the most difficult to chip off.
Really enjoyed it, interesting that Wolff outdrove BAD all day but where the hulk did shine was gouging his required yardage when he was in the rough, takes strength. Glad he won.
They did react to Tiger. Augusta was beefed up in a big way after he lapped the field in his first masters.A distinctive characteristic of Winged Foot is relatively few trees. Seemed to make hardly any difference to missing a fairway by 2m or 10. Players would have been more conservative otherwise. I can see one way that golf can BDC proof courses is by making wider fairway misses more penalising with perhaps lots of undulations.
Change the characteristics of the ball and there will be no need to redevelop courses.If you could do that With COR then you should be able to restrict with ball design.Play with range balls for real...
Has anyone won a PGA event with one of the smaller ball makes like Vice, Seed, Snell ,Vision and such?
As Matt, MTB and others pointed out, missing the fairways was a given for all players in the field this week. So missing it and leaving yourself a wedge is much easier than missing it and having a mid-iron.
So, I reckon (and have done for many years) that they got the whole 'graduated rough' concept arse-about ever since they tried to 'Tiger' proof courses. Rather than making the rough longer the further you are from the centre of the fairway, but consistent along the length of the fairway, they should graduate the length of the rough UP the sides of the fairway.
Using a 400 metre par 4 as an example: there should be literally no rough from the tee box up until the 250 metre mark. It then gets progressively longer from 250 metres until it is 10 cms (or whatever) deep at the 300+metre mark. If you can bomb it straight, you get a huge advantage. But shorter hitters are not penalised anywhere near as much, as they are still hitting a controllable shot from the short-stuff all the time.
I think it's not about the ball itself going too far, but not spinning enough.
As people have said, Bryson or tiger (or jack or GN in their days) hit it longer than most, BUT if you make the ball spin more, the harder you hit it the more risk it'll be way left or right. Good for them if they can control it, but look out if they can't!
Bryson may still be the longest BUT he could also hit a few OB.
And the weather (mainly wind) would have greater influence on shots.
#makespingreatagain
I'd disagree but just me personally.
Go grab a few balatas as hit a few in the fairway with a controlled swing and then try and blast a few.
Yes you'll get a couple youll smash straight but some may be well offline
That for me would be the risk / reward off the tee
Then into greens the same thing.
I don't think something HAS to be done, I like professional golf to be different, but it's one idea
I get it but Bryson swinging at 75% to maintain control is still somebody else swinging at 100% to keep up. I’m with you though, I don’t see a problem with it but if people want to control how far somebody hits a ball, the only option is to designate landing hitting zones for each shot. I think that’s what the drive, pitch and putt mob do. Either that or design courses with a bunch of islands forcing them to leap frog their way up each hole.
Bryson wouldn’t swing at 75% just out of principle.
The point is not to regulate how far everybody is able to hit it, it’s to make hitting it a long way riskier. Driver used to be to hardest club to hit for pros. Now it’s the easiest, because the club heads are huge and forgiving, and the ball doesn’t spin. Make the ball spin again, make club heads smaller with reduced MOI and tighten up the CT testing and then we’re back in business. Otherwise we wake up in 20 years and we’re already at drive, pitch and putt at the pro level.
Let amateurs use whatever they want and tighten it up for the pros. They use control balls in every other ball sport, why not golf. The equipment is bifurcated in other sports too.
Cinderella story, out of nowhere, former greenskeeper, now about to become a Masters champion..... It looks like a mirac.. It's in the hole! It's in the hole!
I don’t really like this guy, but definitely has some interesting content sometimes that perks up my nerdy side.
This one I found particularly interesting where he tests the new ball/balata theories.
I think it addresses a lot of what this discussion is about.
https://youtu.be/CnghW8eHjJU
WITB
TaylorMade SIM2 MAX 9.0 / Titleist TSR 15 / Mizuno MP20 HMB 2I /Mizuno MP20 MMC 4I - 6I / Mizuno MP20 MB 7I - PW / Vokey SM6 50.12F, 54.14F / Mizuno MP R series 60.05 / Odyssey 7 White Hot OG
Baseball is a classic equipment bifurcation sport. No one cares
Baseball is run by team owners who pay employees. Pro golf is run by pro golfers whose only concern is making more money as easily as possible. They’re more likely to bifurcate to disregard any restrictions the official rules of golf contain rather than impose restrictions on themselves.
I wouldn't mind if they did that either. Make the PGL or whatever it's going to be unlimited COR, 8500+ yard courses par 75 whatever brings the $$$ in for tv, AND have the Open championship regulated by R&A and roll it all back for that part of the season. And the Masters can do whatever they want too.
You can only make money off what people want to watch and what TV deals you can do.
Having someone shoot 60 vs a good back 9 on a Sunday with 7 people on contention and the possibility of shot making and a different winner each week depending on course and wind and firmness would get me to watch over the current situation each week. But I'm nothing look paying them millions to run a 'charity' so I don't really have a say in it
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)