2019 PGA Tour

[Captain Nemo]

It wasn’t a bunker.

And he hit a shit shot anyway....karmas a bitch.

[BUSHY]

And he hit a shit shot anyway....karmas a bitch.

[pt73]

I was watching the playoff and heard that too, I wonder how much that will follow him this season.

[BUSHY]

I was watching the playoff and heard that too, I wonder how much that will follow him this season.

I didn’t think his home fans would give it to him but I’m glad they did. Might catch on like mashed potatoes!!

[Webster]

I was watching the playoff and heard that too, I wonder how much that will follow him this season.

Hopefully every single time the cheating piece of shit plays.

[Toxic]

I didn’t think his home fans would give it to him but I’m glad they did. Might catch on like mashed potatoes!!

Should Lucas Herbert cop the same treatment?

[Toolish]

Should Lucas Herbert cop the same treatment?

Once off incident vs a history of various **** ups...not exactly the same.

[Webster]

Should Lucas Herbert cop the same treatment?

Absolutely.

[Jazz18]

Absolutely.

Does Tiger?

[Webster]

Does Tiger?

Why?

[BUSHY]

Should Lucas Herbert cop the same treatment?

I think you missed the point.

[Jazz18]

Why?

Bad drop at the Masters. Moving loose impediments and not replacing his ball. Let's not forget there is no doubt he cheated on his missus as well. More than twice, the amount of times the infraction occurred by which you defined there is no doubt that Reed intentionally cheated. Do you hold Tiger Woods to the same standard?

[Webster]

Bad drop at the Masters. Moving loose impediments and not replacing his ball. Let's not forget there is no doubt he cheated on his missus as well. More than twice, the amount of times the infraction occurred by which you defined there is no doubt that Reed intentionally cheated. Do you hold Tiger Woods to the same standard?

No, because the standard is not the same. Reed and Herberts intent was to cheat, Tigers was not.

And cheating on his missus is of no relevance to this discussion at all.

[Jazz18]

No, because the standard is not the same. Reed and Herberts intent was to cheat, Tigers was not.

And cheating on his missus is of no relevance to this discussion at all.

Yes, that's what I thought you'd say. It's too hard to say the golden boy of golf would intentionally cheat, even if it's possibly the case. And I'm sure Reeds reported history of stealing from his college team mates has nothing to do with your opinion of him as Tigers questionable moral behaviour has nothing to do with your opinion of Tiger.

The Kangaroo court is alive and well.

[Webster]

Yes, that's what I thought you'd say.

I make no apologies for making perfectly sensible statements.

It's too hard to say the golden boy of golf would intentionally cheat, even if it's possibly the case.

Unlike Reed and Herbert, Tiger didn't cheat. So its not "possibly" the case.

And I'm sure Reeds reported history of stealing from his college team mates has nothing to do with your opinion of him as Tigers questionable moral behaviour has nothing to do with your opinion of Tiger.

I have no interest in Reeds past, and judge him only on his actions playing the game, where he clearly cheated and was penalised for doing so. What Tiger does with his todger when not playing golf is nobodies business.

The Kangaroo court is alive and well.

You clearly don't understand what a kangaroo court is.

[Jazz18]

I make no apologies for making perfectly sensible statements.



Unlike Reed and Herbert, Tiger didn't cheat. So its not "possibly" the case.



I have no interest in Reeds past, and judge him only on his actions playing the game, where he clearly cheated and was penalised for doing so. What Tiger does with his todger when not playing golf is nobodies business.



You clearly don't understand what a kangaroo court is.

Ok, let's just keep it about the golf then.

How did you determine Tiger didn't intentionally cheat and Reed definitely did?

[Webster]

Intentionally moving sand to improve your lie (twice!!) the way Herbert and Reed did is an obvious, appalling act of cheating. Their intent was to cheat to gain an advantage, whereas what you suggest Tiger did was not intentional. You don't scrape the sand away TWICE if its an accident. It is cheating.

[Jazz18]

Intentionally moving sand to improve your lie (twice!!) the way Herbert and Reed did is an obvious, appalling act of cheating. Their intent was to cheat to gain an advantage, whereas what you suggest Tiger did was not intentional. You don't scrape the sand away TWICE if its an accident. It is cheating.

You say it like it's fact. How can you, from halfway across the world, determine intent to such clarity in either case?

[BUSHY]

How did you determine Tiger didn't intentionally cheat?

Do you even understand the penalty he was assessed and why?

[Jazz18]

Do you even understand the penalty he was assessed and why?

Explain it to me.........

[BUSHY]

Explain it to me.........

There’s nothing to explain.

[Jazz18]

There’s nothing to explain.

Them why ask the question?

[BUSHY]

Do you even understand the penalty he was assessed and why?

???

You’re saying Tiger is a cheat but won’t explain why the Masters example you provided is cheating?

[Jazz18]

???

You’re saying Tiger is a cheat but won’t explain why the Masters example you provided is cheating?

No I'm not. I was citing examples where you could debate intent as you could with the Reed rules infraction.

[Chilled]

The video of Reed being yelled "Cheater" from the awesome guy in the crowd.

Anyone know what Reed was mouthing to him? Rofl

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymw7su3pNeU