moved from Aus Open thread
Mac, quick query, when a hole is designed, how many pin placements are designed for? Does it vary from Par 3s to par 5s?Cheers
moved from Aus Open thread
Mac, quick query, when a hole is designed, how many pin placements are designed for? Does it vary from Par 3s to par 5s?Cheers
Last edited by PeteyD; 22nd November 2018 at 07:41 AM.
Hi Mac
I have noticed that the vast majority of your designs contain a bunker set that is shaped like a natural scar of the surface, my assumption is your replicating a hazard that has been created by mother nature as opposed to a human
Have you ever considered or been in a position to design conventional/more circular bunker shapes to accommodate existing golf course designs?
If this is not your preference why do you choose to design bunkers the way you currently do
I find your bunkers are always the hardest to get out of! (not saying that its a bad thing, it's called a hazard for a reason)
Examples of what you are talking about are always good. We have down a lot on the sandbelt so they fit with that traditional look.
We did small, round, pot bunkers at Torquay and the bunkers at both Royal Queensland and The Lakes are different again.
The aim ought to be to find a style suiting each piece of land - not repeating the same look over and over.
Speaking of RQ, we played a round of our QLD champs there recently, and the green complexes were polarising (love/hate) amongst the group.
After seeing the Lakes, it appears they are not as severe, but do you have any insight as to the intent of what was done at RQ, particularly the greens?
RQ - Wide fairways. Almost no rough. Centre-line hazards on quite a few holes. And - some severe greens to advantage those who drove to the right part of the fairway and who hit good irons. Hit it far from the hole and the putting is difficult. And there are plenty of great,old severe greens. The critics seem to thing it's a new thing.
As requested, examples taken from RQ, The Lakes and Bonnie Doon respectively
All resemble natural scarring (IMO)
Screen Shot 2018-11-22 at 2.58.04 pm.jpgScreen Shot 2018-11-22 at 2.48.35 pm.jpgScreen Shot 2018-11-22 at 2.55.38 pm.jpg
A slightly firmer question (sorry in advance Mac)
Why did you use trench bunkers at RA #17 when the remaining site was traditional shaped circular design. I understand you wanted to redesign the entire course but it was alarmingly bold to have just hole with this design
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
thecollective
Re RA.
The short answer is if you looked at MacKenzie's plan his vision was not circular bunkers - rather something more spectacular and in line with what we did.
In retrospect we should never have done that hole first - but it was the one the club wanted to do because it was one of the remaining greens they needed to reconstruct.
A good lesson.
Hi Mac
Your thoughts on the 17th @ 'The Cut' ? (Dawesville, W.A)
Never seen it.
Mac,
How often does a designer go back after they are done to see whether their work is playing as intended?
eg. A green slope that might be a bit too severe, or it turns out it cannot be pinned, a bunker that is collecting a bit too much or not enough.
Bruce,
Most courses we work at we do at least an annual audit for the committee - and sometimes two.
Plus we get around a lot - both men's and women's Open's (to see Lakes,Bonnie Doon and Grange)and I play a tournament in Perth so we always have an eye on what's going on.
Mac, re The Doon....
Any chance getting green pics/maps etc via email to putt a book together?
Why is your nickname Mac?
Taylormade M1 16' 430 10.5* Attas G7s
Taylormade M1 17' 460 10.5* Rogue 125msi 60s
Callaway Epic Sub Zero 9* Rogue 125msi 60x
Titleist 917 D2 9.5* Rogue 125msi 70s
Cobra King LTD AD MT 7s
Taylormade M2 15* Speeder Pro 73s
Taylormade SLDR 19* Matrix HD7s
Titleist 716 AP2 5-PW KBS Tour V X stiff
Cleveland 588 Rotex 2.0 Raw Wedges 50* 54* 60* KBS Hi Rev
Callaway MD3 64* PM Grind
Taylormade Spider Si 35" Slant Neck
Mac,
It’s so great to read your responses here. Listening to what you have to say is always fascinating. Do you think a Sweetens Cove-type course would work in Australia given the smaller golfing population and market? If so, would that be a project that would interest you? And if so, where do you think it should/could be built? Sweetens Cove looks bloody amazing; it’s SO COOL what Rob Collins and his team have done there. A great, very creative golf facility accessible to pretty much anyone and everyone.
Also, pretty much same questions as above:
I’d love to see what you, Geoff and OCCM could conjure if you were to design and build something like Zac Blair’s The Buck Club. A project where you could create anything you wanted without being answerable to a committee or members or a developer. Would that look much different to the work you’ve already done?
Thanks Mac.
Ping G400 Max 9* w/ KuroKage TiNi Silver 60
Titleist 917 F2 15* w/ Aldila Rogue Max 75 S
TaylorMade TP UDI 20* w/ KuroKage 70 S graphite
Mizuno MP-4 4-PW w/ Project X Rifle 6.0
SM5 Vokey 50* F Grind & 54* F Grind
SM6 Vokey 60* S Grind
Bettinardi Queen B 8
Would a great but out-of-the-way 9-hole public course work? Maybe - it'd have to be great though because of the perception here golf isn'r real unless it's 18 holes. Geoff and I played Frankston GC today - a real 9-hole hidden gem and it works with 300 members. I think it'd work as a public course as well.
Buck Club? How many clubs work here with a joining fee above $15,000 - unless its in Sydney? They work in US because there is way more money there and an expectation $100k plus joining fees are normal I've heard of $750k and $1m. It's a way different market.
Golflink
WITB
Ping G400 SFT 12* Accra ST55 Tour Z M5
Srixon Z355 17* FW Miyazaki Jinsoku S
RBZ Black 3 HY 19* Rocketfuel 65S
Srixon Zu65 3 20* Nippon NS Pro 980GH
Srixon Z765 S300 4-PW
Tourstage X Wedge 54/10, 58/12
Taylormade Spider Tour Red CS 35"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)