Donate Now
Goal amount for the next month: 1000 AUD, Received: 0 AUD (0%)
**** Please donate to the Toowoomba Hospital Foundation as part of the Leon Treadwell Memorial Charity Day ****
Note: If you would like to avoid Paypal from getting their cut, either make a paypal payment to andyp@ozgolf.net as a "Gift", or PM AndyP for OZgolf's bank account details.
-
15th February 2006 08:46 PM
#1
Senior Member
Grand Slam Winner
Parry reckons game favours long hitters
Parry: Long hitters favouredby: Marcus WilsonSportal.com.au
Veteran golfer Craig Parry says his short stature and modest hitting power makes winning this week's Jacob's Creek Open a huge challenge.
The 40-year-old predicts players that are adept at striking the long ball will have a distinct advantage at Royal Adelaide.
"This is a tough golf course, yesterday, in the sea breeze, it was very difficult - I think the long hitters do have an advantage around this golf course," he said.
"They are able to hit medium to short irons into the long par fours whereas the rest of us are using long irons in and it's very difficult to control the ball.
"Once you're using a two iron, quail high, just getting it in really low and it's not going to stop that quick."
He also joked the designer of the South Australian course wasn't thinking of shorter players (Parry is 168cm tall) when designing the challenging layout.
"I'm playing alright but I always struggle around (Royal) Adelaide because a lot of the holes go right to left and a lot of the holes are blind to me," he said.
"I mean the six foot guys might be able see a few more of the fairways but a lot of the fairways are blind."
And despite being one of the event's high profile competitors, Parry says competition will be tough.
He's confident Australia's emerging golfers will perform well in this week's event.
"There are so many young players coming through and it's just so hard to keep up with all of them."
A crop of talented American players are also set to vie for the championship.
But Parry believes the local golfers will have the edge, especially heading into the final two days of the event.
"It definitely favours the Aussies because of way the golf course will play, it's going to play harder and faster as the time goes on," he said.
"The guys from America aren't going to be used to be able to hit the ball in low …in general it will suit the Aussies."
Grant
Grunt's Golflink
TM Burner - Cobra F Speed 3W - TM Draw 3H - TM Burner 4i-AW - Vokey 54/58 Wedges - Wilson 8862 Blade
-
23rd February 2009 04:05 PM
#2
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
The JW Classic at Vines is an example where course design didn't necessarily favour the long bombers.
Due to the course design, the long hitters had to throttle back to 3Ws and less to put the ball in attack positions. The long hitters could go the 'Big Dog' but they would have to be very accurate.
While walking with Aguilar (he could bomb it for his size) on a practise round on the Tuesday, we discussed the course setup. He felt that he had to play more shots that required him to be accurate and have to use mid-irons more than short irons.
He felt that the course dictated where he had to hit the ball rather than play his own game.
"I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying."
- Woody Allen
-
23rd February 2009 04:09 PM
#3
Senior Member
Order of Merit winner
Drive for show and putt for $$$$$$$$$$$
-
23rd February 2009 04:11 PM
#4
Someone just get him a milk crate
-
23rd February 2009 04:14 PM
#5
Senior Member
Order of Merit winner
Originally Posted by
zigwah
Someone just get him a milk crate
Pallett jack ?
-
23rd February 2009 04:17 PM
#6
Senior Member
Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
-
23rd February 2009 04:18 PM
#7
Senior Member
Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
He's got a point, although at 6'2" I still had trouble seeing many of the landing areas at Royal Adelaide.
-
23rd February 2009 04:47 PM
#8
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
Originally Posted by
idgolfguy
The JW Classic at Vines is an example where course design didn't necessarily favour the long bombers.
Due to the course design, the long hitters had to throttle back to 3Ws and less to put the ball in attack positions. The long hitters could go the 'Big Dog' but they would have to be very accurate.
While walking with Aguilar (he could bomb it for his size) on a practise round on the Tuesday, we discussed the course setup. He felt that he had to play more shots that required him to be accurate and have to use mid-irons more than short irons.
You're kidding, right. If they can hit a fairway wood or even a hybrid to the same place a shorter hitter hits driver, how can you say length isn't a massive bonus? 99% of golfers are more accurate with less club in their hands, so how is that not a benefit to being a big hitter?
-
23rd February 2009 04:57 PM
#9
Senior Member
Major Winner
Fairly stupid statement as of course a longer hitter is going to have an advantage over a shorter hitter given their skill levels are similar.
I'm back.
-
23rd February 2009 05:49 PM
#10
Senior Member
Major Winner
Originally Posted by
dc68
Fairly stupid statement as of course a longer hitter is going to have an advantage over a shorter hitter given their skill levels are similar.
I am with you mate.
What a bloody stupid comment.
-
23rd February 2009 06:22 PM
#11
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
His point was that when it came down to the shots requiring irons, there was not much of a difference in terms of distance and error margin when comparing a 6 iron to 7 iron. The high percentage areas didn't change whether you were long or short. The Vines' 'safe areas' did not require drivers even for the short hitters. They were fixed distances that did not require drivers even for the short hitters.
For example, the 17th did not require a driver unless you wanted to be playing your shot on a downslope. The flat spot on that hole was about 20-30 long. You either used a 6 iron or 7 iron in from there.
The 18th was the same. To reach the slope, you needed to carry 265m. Once you got there the slope carried you down to the 285-300m mark giving you about 165-180m in. For most this is a 1-1.5 club difference.
I saw Casey hit his drive past Dougherty on the 7th - about 15m in front. Casey's was 290m. He used an 8 iron cut in to 8ft. Dougherty used an 8 iron to 6ft.
"I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying."
- Woody Allen
-
23rd February 2009 07:21 PM
#12
Senior Member
Touring Pro (European Tour)
Poor Craig. A couple of flaws in his argument.
(1) Have a look at his physique. A few less chicko rolls & perhaps some more medicine ball crunches (and the rest) might help. Craig, give Tiger a call. He may have a few tips.
(2) To use a tennis analogy, imagine the laughter if someone like Hewitt claimed that the harder hitters had an advantage over the others. Duh?
Oh, and perhaps to throw in Craig's comment about having to hit two iron which is going to come in too low. Get a bloody hybrid mate if you want to launch higher.
-
23rd February 2009 07:57 PM
#13
Senior Member
Major Winner
Originally Posted by
TheTrueReview
Poor Craig. A couple of flaws in his argument.
(1) Have a look at his physique.
A few less chicko rolls & perhaps some more medicine ball crunches (and the rest) might help. Craig, give Tiger a call. He may have a few tips.
(2) To use a tennis analogy, imagine the laughter if someone like Hewitt claimed that the harder hitters had an advantage over the others. Duh?
Oh, and perhaps to throw in Craig's comment about having to hit two iron which is going to come in too low.
Get a bloody hybrid mate if you want to launch higher.
Quality post.
-
23rd February 2009 08:07 PM
#14
Senior Member
Major Winner
Originally Posted by
TheTrueReview
Poor Craig. A couple of flaws in his argument.
So what he is saying is that "Short fat guys can't beat anyone"
Really . . . never would have picked that.
-
23rd February 2009 10:22 PM
#15
Senior Member
Major Winner
Next thing you know, chunky ex-NRL front-rowers will be complaining that forwards in the modern game need to be fit athletes; the fat bastards simply cannot compete.
News just in: Short players have a disadvantage in basketball!
-
24th February 2009 09:45 AM
#16
Senior Member
Multiple Major Winner
Being a short-arse who hit's worm burners never stopped Corey Pavin. I'm sick of hearing these whiney sound bites from Parry.
golflink WITB
TSR3 9deg |
TSR3 15deg |
TSR2 3H |
T100 4-GW |
Vokey 56 & 60 |
Newport 2.5
-
24th February 2009 10:57 AM
#17
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
Originally Posted by
BrisVegas
Being a short-arse who hit's worm burners never stopped Corey Pavin. I'm sick of hearing these whiney sound bites from Parry.
Or Justin Leonard.
I don't think Zach Johnson is a long hitter either.
RIP -
Duncan Bennett & Leon Treadwell
Unitlink
-
24th February 2009 11:00 AM
#18
Senior Member
Major Winner
Ben Curtis too.
In Golf Digest WITB, his driver distance is 250m and 7 iron is 150m.
-
24th February 2009 12:08 PM
#19
Senior Member
Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
-
24th February 2009 03:39 PM
#20
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
Tim Clark is about a 4HC distance off all his clubs. He's 5'7'' and hits about 250m with the BigDog.
"I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying."
- Woody Allen
-
24th February 2009 03:43 PM
#21
Senior Member
Grand Slam Winner
But he uses a cheating stick.
-
24th February 2009 03:45 PM
#22
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
They should be banned. However, if they did, there would be almost no one playing on the Champions.
"I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying."
- Woody Allen
-
24th February 2009 03:46 PM
#23
Senior Member
Grand Slam Winner
So what? Who watches the senior tour anyway?
-
24th February 2009 03:59 PM
#24
Senior Member
Touring Pro (PGA)
If that tour dies, how am I going to get onto the pro circuit in a few years?
"I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying."
- Woody Allen
-
24th February 2009 04:41 PM
#25
Senior Member
Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
I'll see your Zach Johnson & raise you a David Toms.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
By jaster in forum Golf Matters
Replies: 52
Last Post: 19th March 2014, 05:07 PM
-
By jaster in forum Golf Matters
Replies: 32
Last Post: 4th March 2012, 01:45 AM
-
By jaster in forum Golf Matters
Replies: 12
Last Post: 4th October 2005, 12:21 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules