Welcome to the ozgolf.net forums.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 20 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 489
  1. #251
    Senior Member Multiple Major Winner
    Join Date
    Nov 01, 2008
    Location
    Redlands, on the shores of Moreton Bay
    Posts
    19,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shazza_rs View Post
    JC. See rule 13-2 improving lie. The player can only remove irregularities on the teeing ground.

    I believe I was in fact correct.
    Incorrect Shaz, see Decision 23 - 1/6.

  2. #252
    Senior Member Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
    Join Date
    Dec 06, 2006
    Location
    On a late summer run
    Posts
    25,947

    Default

    As Dave said (which is what I meant), you can remove loose impediments before dropping.

  3. #253
    Senior Member Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
    Join Date
    Dec 06, 2006
    Location
    On a late summer run
    Posts
    25,947

    Default

    Daves decision is the exact ruling I was referring too.

  4. #254
    Senior Member Multiple Major Winner
    Join Date
    Nov 01, 2008
    Location
    Redlands, on the shores of Moreton Bay
    Posts
    19,213

    Default

    23-1/6 Removal of Loose Impediments from Area in Which Ball to Be Dropped

    Q. Through the green, is it permissible for a player to remove loose impediments from the area in which he is preparing to drop his ball?

    A. Yes.

  5. #255
    Moderator Touring Pro (European Tour)
    Join Date
    Jul 07, 2005
    Posts
    3,985

    Default

    Just found the decision. It seems like the decision is a contradiction the the actual rule.

    I'll admit to getting it wrong. Didn't think I was though.

    I still don't get how that isn't improving your lie? If your ball was to end up on a twig or leaf it's tough titties. But if you are dropping you can move them. Makes no sense to me.
    Last edited by shazza_rs; 24th April 2011 at 09:43 PM.

  6. #256
    Senior Member Multiple Major Winner
    Join Date
    Nov 01, 2008
    Location
    Redlands, on the shores of Moreton Bay
    Posts
    19,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shazza_rs View Post
    Just found the decision. It seems like the decision is a contradiction the the actual rule.

    I'll admit to getting it wrong. Didn't think I was though.
    You are half right Shazz, you can't improve the potential lie. You can't fill in a divot, remove, bend or step down living material etc . Removing a loose impediment isn't considered to be improving your lie (or stance or swing). The same as you are allowed to remove loose impediments from around your ball before hitting it.

  7. #257
    Moderator Touring Pro (European Tour)
    Join Date
    Jul 07, 2005
    Posts
    3,985

    Default

    Yeah around your ball. If you end up on top of a leaf or twig it can't be removed. Still makes no sense to me.
    Last edited by shazza_rs; 24th April 2011 at 09:51 PM.

  8. #258
    Senior Member Touring Pro (PGA)
    Join Date
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location
    On the Back Deck
    Posts
    6,424

    Default

    Can water be used to define internal ob without any markings

  9. #259
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 22, 2009
    Location
    Meh...
    Posts
    17,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter_rs View Post
    Can water be used to define internal ob without any markings
    Is it a local rule?

  10. #260
    Senior Member Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
    Join Date
    Dec 06, 2006
    Location
    On a late summer run
    Posts
    25,947

    Default

    It's simple Shaz. You don't have a lie until you drop the ball, therefore you can't improve it by removing loose impediments. Also, you can always remove loose impediments, unless you are in a hazard.

    I know this rule because I was in the exact situation that you were a while back. I was sure it was a penalty and I was wrong.

  11. #261
    Senior Member Touring Pro (PGA)
    Join Date
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location
    On the Back Deck
    Posts
    6,424

    Default

    It's on a sign by order of the committee but not the look rules board. The sign just says tee shots coming to rest on the left of the water are ob.

    So the second part would be can you have ob just for a tee shot?

  12. #262
    Senior Member Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
    Join Date
    Dec 06, 2006
    Location
    On a late summer run
    Posts
    25,947

    Default

    Pete, not sure on this one, bur I think you would need stakes to define oob. I've played courses with internal oob and it was always defined with white stakes.

    I can't see how one shot can be considered oob, but not another. Very strange.

  13. #263
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 22, 2009
    Location
    Meh...
    Posts
    17,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter_rs View Post
    It's on a sign by order of the committee but not the look rules board. The sign just says tee shots coming to rest on the left of the water are ob.

    So the second part would be can you have ob just for a tee shot?
    This is a long shot, because I was informed when I played there. Windaroo 16?

  14. #264
    Senior Member Touring Pro (PGA)
    Join Date
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location
    On the Back Deck
    Posts
    6,424

    Default

    There are a few course around Brisbane with internal oob. Nudgee north 16 as well

  15. #265
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 22, 2009
    Location
    Meh...
    Posts
    17,072

    Default

    From memory Windaroo is staked. Shame, because it looks like an exciting way to play the hole.

  16. #266
    Senior Member Touring Pro (Nationwide Tour)
    Join Date
    Nov 10, 2008
    Location
    the Apple Isle all the way
    Posts
    1,980

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Canuck View Post
    ...I can't see how one shot can be considered oob, but not another. Very strange.
    JC, on my course we have an internal OOB that is only in play for one of the two parallel holes that it is between. Do they get away with this differentiation because they can easily say the stakes are "live" on the eleventh but not the twelfth as opposed to the eg. above where it is just off the tee?

  17. #267
    Moderator Touring Pro (European Tour)
    Join Date
    Jul 07, 2005
    Posts
    3,985

    Default

    Thanks for clearing that up gents. I'm not feeling entirely bad about it. He moved a log that is against the path which is actually an Immovable obstruction on the local rules board at the same time.

    Oh and he was slow as a wet week and was giving me the shites. Pete and I walking were getting to the green quicker than he and his mate in a cart. We lost a full hole and a half on the group in front as well.

  18. #268
    Senior Member Multiple Major Winner
    Join Date
    Nov 01, 2008
    Location
    Redlands, on the shores of Moreton Bay
    Posts
    19,213

    Default

    If he had known the rules himself he shouldn't have been worried Shaz!

    The one that I let slide but am really tempted to pull up is the generous interpretation of casual water relief and when it is tee up. You can guarantee most players will take the relief on the side that is closet to the centre of the fairway or where they will have the best lie/position. When I show them the steps to take relief correctly they usually just look at me as if to say "you think I am stupid or something"

  19. #269
    Victorious Confederate Captain Order of Merit winner
    Join Date
    Sep 12, 2007
    Posts
    9,842

    Default

    I had a relief situation yesterday, where the nearest point from GUR was in a horrible spot. I went back and dropped it there, chopped the chip, made a double.

    My playing partner asked why I did not take the easier spot a further 2 metres away - I pointed out it was not 'the nearest point of relief', to which he replied 'everyone else does it'

    Chopperlink

    WITB
    Cobra Speedzone::Cobra Speedzone Tour 3 wood, Cobra F6 5 wood: Mizuno H4's, :Mizuno 50, Mizuno MP 56 and 60*:TM Works #7
    AndyC will always be my AndyB(unny)

  20. #270
    Senior Member Golf Hall of Fame Inductee
    Join Date
    Apr 28, 2004
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    30,337

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wbennett View Post
    I have 60 apps on my Android. None that I can tell have ever been able to judge wind in any way, or is a compass etc.
    GPS Status is one, do you have that?

    am able to use it in comp with my GPS application wtih the SIM removed because
    I see no reason to remove the SIM card.

    Quote Originally Posted by peter_rs View Post
    Can water be used to define internal ob without any markings
    Emerald Lakes does on the 4th hole, however the water remains the hazard, if you hit over the other side of the water you are OB.
    There appears to be nothing in the rules defining how such boundaries should be marked, as long as the markings are accurate, Rule 33. It would seem then that a hazard margin meets that requirement
    --
    Criticism doesn't bother me, as it means I am doing something and people are watching.
    Handy-Cap

  21. #271
    Senior Member Touring Pro (PGA)
    Join Date
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location
    On the Back Deck
    Posts
    6,424

    Default

    Can it only apply to one shot.

    33 says accurately defined and says stakes and lines usally

  22. #272
    Senior Member Multiple Major Winner
    Join Date
    Nov 01, 2008
    Location
    Redlands, on the shores of Moreton Bay
    Posts
    19,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter_rs View Post
    Can it only apply to one shot.

    33 says accurately defined and says stakes and lines usally
    You mean like Oxley. The internal OOB on the left on 7th only applies when playing the 7th if I remember correctly!?

  23. #273
    Senior Member Touring Pro (PGA)
    Join Date
    Feb 16, 2005
    Location
    On the Back Deck
    Posts
    6,424

    Default

    Nudgee north 16th oob is only for "the tee shot". Its a dog leg left u have to cross the water

    It's to stop people trying to drive the green

  24. #274
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 22, 2009
    Location
    Meh...
    Posts
    17,072

    Default

    Is it not accurate that you are either in the water or out of it? In the water is a hazard, out of the water is OOB.

    That's how I would read it. If they did have stakes, how would you get over the water to see if you're actually inside or outside?

  25. #275
    Senior Member Multiple Major Winner
    Join Date
    Nov 01, 2008
    Location
    Redlands, on the shores of Moreton Bay
    Posts
    19,213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peter_rs View Post
    Nudgee north 16th oob is only for "the tee shot". Its a dog leg left u have to cross the water

    It's to stop people trying to drive the green
    OK, I thought there were OOB posts along the other side of the creek? to the back of the 17th Tee.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Golf rules.......I need to be tested.
    By Flowergirl in forum Golf Matters
    Replies: 203
    Last Post: 20th December 2009, 05:58 PM
  2. mans rules
    By ozdevil in forum 19th Hole
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22nd September 2009, 08:23 PM
  3. Rules, Rules, Rules...
    By Rusty in forum Golf Matters
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 3rd May 2008, 05:34 PM
  4. New rules + changes.....
    By jaster in forum Golf Matters
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 29th September 2005, 12:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top