PDA

View Full Version : Cleveland CG16 V TaylorMade RBZ Irons Sets



wat17
29th August 2012, 05:12 PM
Trying to decide between the Cleveland CG16 an TaylorMade RBZ Irons Sets. For those who have use one or both what are your thoughts? I am a golfer hitting around 100 looking for something forgiving. Some comments buried deep in another thread: - wizard_of_oz: I've hit both and have preference to the CG16. The CG16 are as soft a cast iron that I've hit so while not quite a forged, they do feel soft off the face. Doesn't have the louder 'click' of cast irons, more muted. Burner 2.0 irons are something you could consider as well. - aym: Yeah same as the RBZ irons and I couldn't tell the difference in terms of feel.

Dotty
29th August 2012, 05:31 PM
Seeing you visit Drummond, also have a look at Cobra. (A set of S3 Max has just revived my game.)

virge666
29th August 2012, 06:33 PM
Cg 16 is my pick as I have a set spare going cheap.

:)

3oneday
29th August 2012, 06:34 PM
Don't we all.

wat17
29th August 2012, 08:56 PM
Don't think its sounds too postive if everyone is selling their set

3oneday
29th August 2012, 10:01 PM
We're all ho's in here, and cg16's are really designed for guys looking for more forgiveness than feel.

wat17
31st August 2012, 08:46 AM
cg16's are really designed for guys looking for more forgiveness than feel.

I like forgiveness. :roll:

3oneday
31st August 2012, 10:05 AM
Either would suit.