PDA

View Full Version : 58....WHAT THE???



jaster
15th June 2004, 10:13 PM
Awesome round by an obviously very talented golfer :shock:

http://www.pga.org.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=24084

http://www.pga.org.au/cp2/c8/webi/article/024084ae.JPG

The 26th anniversary Pro-Am at the Mundubbera Golf Club was today recognised in a way that nobody had ever expected. After leading the 40 strong field of Professionals after day one of the event with a 6 under par 62, Brisbane based Professional Michael Wright let fly with a Course, Tournament, State, National and maybe even International Record of 58 including 11 birdies and a solitary bogie.

The golf grape vine had done its job and word was out as Wright stood over a 20 metre chip shot on the last, the par 3, 18th hole. As all good fairytales end Wright chipped it in, to send all historians diving into the record books.

The 10 under par round of 58 had been achieved and the Norm Wallace Trophy in the bag.
(The Norm Wallace memorial is a $1000 bonus for the leading professional of each years Ellendale Open).

Runner up in the event New South Welshman Steven Jeffress, can feel a little disappointed as he equalled the previous Tournament record of 11 under, set by Chris Downes only to come up 5 shots short.

The Queensland Sunshine Tour heads to Club Pelican Course on Tuesday for the $30,000 Pro-Am which includes a small Seniors event before driving to Townsville for the first of two Von Nida Tour events The Queensland Masters at The Willows.

Speirsy11
15th June 2004, 10:16 PM
Ummm.....wow?

Not bad......I bet he's seen that bogey in his head 10,000 times......

Speirsy11

jaster
15th June 2004, 10:18 PM
I'm sure he would still be happy with the 58 ;)

Speirsy11
15th June 2004, 10:20 PM
True, but you know how golfers are......it's always "I played great, but if had only....."

Speirsy11

jaster
15th June 2004, 10:24 PM
I think that is the 73 and 74 shooters....I'm sure the 58 shooter wouldn't do that too much ;) I know I wouldn't :P

McMw
15th June 2004, 10:25 PM
only 10 under....on a par68...

doesn't have the same feel to a 68 on a par 72 course...(for me!)

AndyP
15th June 2004, 11:44 PM
only 10 under....on a par68...

doesn't have the same feel to a 68 on a par 72 course...(for me!)

That's harsh. You'd prefer 4 under the card to a 10 under :?:

AndyP
15th June 2004, 11:48 PM
On second thoughts, I just looked up the details of Mundubbera GC.

9 Holes (so no surprises the second time round), 5490m total and an ACR of 64.

That takes some of the shine off it.
A 58 still would look good on a score card.

McMw
16th June 2004, 08:23 AM
obviouly I meant 58 on a par 72 course... :oops: :oops: :lol:

Jarro
16th June 2004, 08:39 AM
geez you guys are a hard bunch :roll:

give the poor guy some credit .... 58 is a bloody good score no matter what Par the course is.

the guy can obviously play 8)

jaster
16th June 2004, 03:41 PM
I'm with jarro....58 is a 58 is a 58....bloody hell :shock: :? Who cares about the course?? If it was that easy why hadn't anyone else shot 58 there before? :roll:

McMw
16th June 2004, 05:10 PM
so does a 58 on an 18hole pitch-and-putt count???
coz that might be the only way I'll ever break 60 before I die.... 8)

jaster
16th June 2004, 05:55 PM
Yep...I'd count it :P

AndyP
16th June 2004, 08:28 PM
I'm with jarro....58 is a 58 is a 58....bloody hell :shock: :? Who cares about the course??
I was just stating the facts. I still said a 58 was great.


If it was that easy why hadn't anyone else shot 58 there before? :roll:
It's Mundubbera.

jaster
17th June 2004, 04:52 AM
Big difference between the facts and your opinion, "takes the shine off" is your opinion, not fact :wink: :P :D

terryand
17th June 2004, 07:32 AM
I have to agree with Andy that playing a coarse that is less than 5500 metres,where obviously you will be hitting chip shots(anywhere from 30 metres to greenside....this distance is these guys bread and butter) to most of the par 4's rather than mid irons and I would say what ever par 5's are there are easy reached.

This coarse is over 1000 metres shorter than Brookwater and 800+ metres less than Indro West...Say no more.

You all know how much easier it is when you play a coarse like McLeod as aposed to one of the above and Mcleod is no where near as short as this one.Sorry Andy but you proved this theory.

The pros going from a standard length coarse to this one, is like the rest of us going from our home coarse to a pitch n putt.

Maybe the reason the coarse record wasn't that low is that there wasn't enough prize money to woe the top pro-am pro there.

Even though this is only my opinion,i think its a pretty solid argument.

Terry.

jaster
17th June 2004, 07:37 AM
Well let's all play there and see how easy it is then 8)

Flowergirl
17th June 2004, 09:04 AM
58 ----- Big deal !!! I played really bad yesterday and shot a 51!!!
Oh.........we're talking about 18 holes are we???? :oops: :oops: :wink:

Jarro
17th June 2004, 10:00 AM
58 around Wynnum would be a heck of a score :shock:

McMw
17th June 2004, 10:16 AM
let's compare shall we....

are we saying that this bloke's 58 is as good as Maruyama's 58???

Same "final" score...but c'mon.... 8)

let's take off the blinkers ppl!!! :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:

BrisVegas
17th June 2004, 12:44 PM
58 around Wynnum would be a heck of a score :shock:

Hey Jarro, I think the course record around Wynnum is 62 (I could be wrong). Would need to shoot a 60 to be comparable. Possible I guess, but not an every day occurrence! I'd wager the greens at Wynnum are a little more predictable though...

AndyP
17th June 2004, 05:52 PM
My posts never state that it was a bad score, I think it is a great score.
I stated that by looking at the details of Mundubbera course takes "some of the shine off" the score. Shooting a round of 58 here is not the same as a 58 at Royal Melbourne.

Regardless of length, it is the ACR which is supposed to determine the difficulty of a course.

Course Par ACR Length
Brookwater 72 73 6497
Indro West 72 73 6345
McLeod 71 71 5918
Wynnum 70 67 5353
Mundubbera 68 64 5490

Terry, I am baffled as to why you would agree with me, then use McLeod as your example. :?

jaster
17th June 2004, 05:58 PM
As long as you think it's a good score then I am happy with that.

terryand
17th June 2004, 06:01 PM
Andy, to me McLeod is a snack after playing Indro all the time and places like brooky, even though I didn't cut it in the "AP Cup" :lol:

I just find it heaps easier when I'm hitting 52,56 and 60 degree wedges into greens rather than 8 iron to 3 irons.

Terry.

BrisVegas
17th June 2004, 09:03 PM
What's the par/ACR/yardage at City GC these days. I always thought it was pretty short, but very tight.

I guess my point is that a course doesn't need to be long to be tough. :wink:

goughy
17th June 2004, 09:10 PM
Bris, City's par is 71 and it's acr is 71. For those that have played both courses in toowoomba, middle ridge's par is 72 and it's acr is 71.

City is about 5850mtrs total.

AndyP
18th June 2004, 07:13 AM
I guess my point is that a course doesn't need to be long to be tough. :wink:

Maybe they should measure a course in average width of fairways. :wink: