What do you guys think of these??

[djhgolf]

Gauge Design Milled 1018 Forged CB's. Limited...

By Dave Whitlam

http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee344/djhgolf/IMG_0515.jpg
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee344/djhgolf/IMG_0516.jpg
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee344/djhgolf/IMG_0517.jpg
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee344/djhgolf/IMG_0518.jpg
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee344/djhgolf/IMG_0519.jpg

[henno]

Classic. That's how cavity backs should look. (ala J33CB, 710CB, Miuras, etc).

[MegaWatty]

Hot.

I think they'd look better with a ferrule though.

[live4golf]

I need a ciggie now...

Dibs

[Jarro]

Very nice

[MegaWatty]

I need a ciggie now...

Dibs

Massive issues!

[live4golf]

Massive issues!

MEGA Issues even :)

[Captain Nemo]

Hot.

I think they'd look better with a ferrule though.

+1

[simmsy]

yep wish i had the game for them.

[Stuartd147]

Very nice...they remind me of my old DCI's when they first came out...stu

[dean0820]

nice clean lines, lovely club. don't like the gauge design typeface and logo tho, would love to redesign them.

[Dave]

i like plain "classic" looking clubs, but something about them doesn't do it for me

[henno]

I think they'd look better with a ferrule though.

I'm pretty sure they were just heads and the photographer has just crudely slipped a shaft in there for the photos.

[markTHEblake]

Not much, bog standard design that many use


http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/ee344/djhgolf/IMG_0515.jpg

Buy these for $20 a head and rough em up with some course sandpaper, and all your mates will Ooh Aah just the same.

http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/2787/ma0099.jpg

[Moe Norman]

I think live4golf wants to stick a shaft in there too.

Also, they would look better with a bit of bag chatter.

[Stuartd147]

You guys crack me up!!! :lol::lol::lol:

[petethepilot]

I thought Gauge Design folded a while ago and some guy bought the rights to the name and is making stuff out of china now (unlike the previous Jap produced GD)!

Pete

They used to do great putters!!!

[Ferrins]

Gauge Design folded and some of the people are at Roma Ro.

[Ferrins]

Bridgestone J's Professional Weapon are very similar

[Ferrins]

Well they looked similar, until I put them next to each other.

[TheNuclearOne]

lmao

[hocko]

Bridgestone J's Professional Weapon are very similar


Well they looked similar, until I put them next to each other.

LOL, I was was just about to say..."No they don't"

[rubin]

not a fan.

[henno]

not a fan.

I'm interested to hear what you consider a nice looking cavity back if you don't like these. Genuine question.

[idgolfguy]

Srixon i302s, Miura CBs, Ping S59s.

[goonie]

Maxfli Revos anyone?

[3oneday]

They look nice, but as everyone else has said... just another clone. You'd do your arse in resale too :)

[PeteyD]

Being 10th anniversary model they may be designed to look like irons that are 10 years old?

[hocko]

I'm interested to hear what you consider a nice looking cavity back if you don't like these. Genuine question.
These.
10081


Srixon i302s, Miura CBs, Ping S59s.
Agreed

[henno]

These.
10081


Agreed

Ahem.



Miuras

;-)

[Webster]

It only matters what they look like at address, not from the back.

[rubin]

I'm interested to hear what you consider a nice looking cavity back if you don't like these. Genuine question.

In general, I'm not a huge fan of full cavity irons. I prefer the blade/muscle back look.

I do rate the srixon i302's, and the Nike VR cavity irons.
http://www.equip2golf.com/wordpress/wp-content/themes/blixed/images/content/whatsnew/2008/nike_vr_splitcavity_iron.jpg

But having said that, I would never put them in play. :wink:

[TourFit]

Classic. That's how cavity backs should look. (ala J33CB, 710CB, Miuras, etc).


I'm interested to hear what you consider a nice looking cavity back if you don't like these. Genuine question.



10084

Not unlike these I would think...?

[IanO]

It only matters what they look like at address, not from the back.
:smt038 What Jack said

[Hux]

In general, I'm not a huge fan of full cavity irons. I prefer the blade/muscle back look.

I do rate the srixon i302's, and the Nike VR cavity irons.
http://www.equip2golf.com/wordpress/wp-content/themes/blixed/images/content/whatsnew/2008/nike_vr_splitcavity_iron.jpg

But having said that, I would never put them in play. :wink:


VR Cav's are ugly compared to the glorious Tour Proto Split Cavities they released in the early 2000's. I need to upload a pic of them.

They are probably THE best looking Nike iron ever, although in reality they look like a Miura CB201
http://www.jwp-golf.de/miura_cb201_2.jpghttp://www.jwp-golf.de/miura_cb201_2.jpg.

[markTHEblake]

It only matters what they look like at address, not from the back.

But the playing partners only get a woody from seeing the fancy irons upside down in the gof bag.

Hmm, I think i just worked out why chicks get those tattoos on their backs.

[PeteyD]

AssAntlers?

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/421598279_803840cc8c.jpg

[dave1]

kind of reminds me of the old cleveland TA7 action clubs


http://www.equip2golf.com/images/newproducts/2001/cleveland_ta7_post.jpg

nice simple clean cut design

I personally hate the look of the most of the irons these days...with stickrs, insters and all that bling when there is no need to put bling into a cavity back iron...even the mp58's from mizuno while a lovely set of irons - that instert in the back made me puke

[dean0820]

dave, so the rule is; bling clothes = yes. bling clubs = no, correct?
i concur.

[dean0820]

dave, so the rule is; bling clothes = yes. bling clubs = no, correct?
i concur.

[Oldplayer]

Good looking club, just not worth the asking price.