PDA

View Full Version : Your National Rank



sms316
2nd June 2009, 11:26 AM
I can't say I look at my GolfLink page too often, but I had a look this morning and noticed that they have added a National Rank, based on your exact handicap.

Of course if you upgrade to GolfLink Mates :roll:, you can see your State, Club, and Grade rankings as well.

My exact at the moment is 0.1. Ranked 1211 (would have expected about 500).

My brother is on 4.3. Ranked 5232 (about what I would expect).

I'd like to see the ranking of someone on 36.4, if for no other reason than we could see how many GolfLink users there are (and how much the operators of GolfLink get out of male users).

adlo
2nd June 2009, 11:29 AM
14.4 puts me at 79049

henno
2nd June 2009, 11:29 AM
19.6 ranked 147194.

henno
2nd June 2009, 11:30 AM
14.4 puts me at 79049

Looks like there are almost as many golfers between 14.4 and 19.6 as there are between scratch and 14.4 :?

sms316
2nd June 2009, 11:31 AM
Looks like there are almost as many golfers between 14.4 and 19.6 as there are between scratch and 14.4 :?
That isn't surprising.

just
2nd June 2009, 11:32 AM
21.4 - 170015.

shazza_rs
2nd June 2009, 11:36 AM
11.3 has me 2118 in the chicks ....

dc68
2nd June 2009, 11:37 AM
4.1 = 4645

Dotty
2nd June 2009, 11:38 AM
A 31.7 marker is just over 246,000.

This 10.7 marker is just under 37,000.

dc68
2nd June 2009, 11:46 AM
brother 1.1 = 1622

haysey
2nd June 2009, 11:48 AM
8.7 = 23781

adlo
2nd June 2009, 11:49 AM
That is weird given sms rank. Only another 400 people between 0.1 and 1.1.

Chris32
2nd June 2009, 11:49 AM
How can I find mine out without upgrading to golflink mates? Or not possible

sms316
2nd June 2009, 11:50 AM
How can I find mine out without upgrading to golflink mates? Or not possible
Don't need Mates for National Rank.

adlo
2nd June 2009, 11:51 AM
How can I find mine out without upgrading to golflink mates? Or not possible

35372

Its on the main page now

Webster
2nd June 2009, 11:53 AM
pointless

adlo
2nd June 2009, 11:55 AM
Some people love to be ranked Jack, like sms

sms316
2nd June 2009, 11:56 AM
Some people love to be ranked Jack, like sms
Rank. Not ranked.
:wink:

adlo
2nd June 2009, 11:58 AM
Apologies

AndyP
2nd June 2009, 11:58 AM
It's interesting for discussion and nothing else.

Dotty
2nd June 2009, 12:00 PM
pointless
It's just a number.
No different to the digits on your number plate, or a chest-bib in the City-To-Surf.

adlo
2nd June 2009, 12:02 PM
Pi?

Chris32
2nd June 2009, 12:03 PM
35372

Its on the main page now

Ha, cheers

Webster
2nd June 2009, 12:03 PM
Ok, a bottle of Stones for the person who can post the golflink number of the number 1 ranked male and female in the country. You have 24 hours. Good luck.

Jack.

adlo
2nd June 2009, 12:05 PM
Blakey PI to the rescue

just
2nd June 2009, 12:07 PM
a bottle of Stones
Now that's rank.

Webster
2nd June 2009, 12:16 PM
Stones is lovely stuff and you know it.

just
2nd June 2009, 12:21 PM
I only drink the Special Reserve (http://www.stonesgingerwine.com/products/stones_special_reserve.shtml) myself. Massive, fruit driven style with excellent mouthfeel.

Dotty
2nd June 2009, 12:34 PM
Our no. 2 associate has a national rank of 18. Unfortunately, I can't see the rank of our best associate, as she is handicapped by her other club.

Chris32
2nd June 2009, 12:45 PM
The blokes one would have to be out of these guys I'd imagine -

1 NISBET Daniel Caboolture
2 SHERRATT Jordan Thaxted Park
3 MACPHERSON Bryden Peninsula
4 BECKMANN Daniel Yarra Yarra
5 JAGER Matt Melville Glades
6 SMITH Brendan Pymble
7 SCRIVENER Jason Mandurah
8 MCCARTHY Ryan Seabrook
9 RICHARDSON Kalem Riverside
10 NINYETTE Brody Joondalup
11 McCARDLE Maxwell Flagstaff Hill

Webster
2nd June 2009, 12:51 PM
I dont want names, I want a clickable link to the top rater's golf link accounts. Shouldnt be too hard to track down.

sms316
2nd June 2009, 12:54 PM
What's Boonie off these days?

I reckon plus 4.0 would be about #1.

Chris32
2nd June 2009, 12:57 PM
SHERRATT Jordan Thaxted Park - plays off +3 but dunno how to get the golflink numbers

Grunt
2nd June 2009, 05:18 PM
Grunt H'cap 17.6 Rank 118823

markTHEblake
2nd June 2009, 05:28 PM
The blokes one would have to be out of these guys I'd imagine -

Unlikely. any of the players in that list are defined as 'recognised golfers' and as such have national handicaps which are much harder to get low than a club handicap. (there may even be a limit of +1 for a national handicap :? ) - unless of course they have a club handicap somewhere.

The lowest club handicapped golfer in australia will most likely be some unknown Achilles Jones who lives out in the sticks, plays only one course off +6 or whatever and nobody else ever heard of him cos whenever he plays somewhere else he automatically plays of 0 or 1.

The lowest club handicap i have heard of is +4 from a couple of golfers. One of the Emerald Lakes blokes, wobbles between +2 and +3

Daves
2nd June 2009, 05:31 PM
Grunt H'cap 17.6 Rank 118823

Ditto, identical HC and rank.

henno
2nd June 2009, 05:34 PM
Ditto, identical HC and rank.

Well that proves that their ranking algorythm is a load of bullshit.

Chris32
2nd June 2009, 05:43 PM
Unlikely. any of the players in that list are defined as 'recognised golfers' and as such have national handicaps which are much harder to get low than a club handicap. (there may even be a limit of +1 for a national handicap :? ) - unless of course they have a club handicap somewhere.

The lowest club handicapped golfer in australia will most likely be some unknown Achilles Jones who lives out in the sticks, plays only one course off +6 or whatever and nobody else ever heard of him cos whenever he plays somewhere else he automatically plays of 0 or 1.

The lowest club handicap i have heard of is +4 from a couple of golfers. One of the Emerald Lakes blokes, wobbles between +2 and +3

Yeah good point, but club handicaps are not recognized golflink handicaps are they?

I checked one of the young guys where I play, he is off +1 and is ranked 145

ParMaster
2nd June 2009, 05:55 PM
0.0 Hcp = National Rank of 1211.

My hcp 2.3 = National Rank of 2331.

Brendan Smiths Hcp +3.0 = National Rank of 20.

Daniel Nisbets Handicap +3.6 = National Rank of 7.

Scott Arnolds Handicap +2.7 = National Rank of 31.

Michael Smyths Handicap +0.5 = National Rank of 225.

Matt Jagers Handicap +1.7 = National Rank of 70.

Daniel Beckmanns Handicap +1.6 = National Rank of 74.

Ryan McCarthys Handicap +2.1 = National Rank of 53.



Theres a couple of them...:)

Courty
2nd June 2009, 06:09 PM
My 7.7 puts me at about 18,701, but I reckon there'd be at least 25,000 better golfers than me. :neutral:

Scottt
2nd June 2009, 06:22 PM
9.1 = 25938

Henno: shouldn't the same exact h'cap have the same rank? How could they place one guy of 17.1 ahead of another off 17.1? Or am I missing something?

Dennis
2nd June 2009, 06:24 PM
My exact at the moment is 0.1. Ranked 1211 (would have expected about 500).


I assume Golflink is prone to errors if you show a hcap of 0.1??

Me....11.4 = 42817

Scottt
2nd June 2009, 06:29 PM
Pity they can't rank you for parts of your game. We could look at PY's chipping rank and it would tell us how many players are registered to golflink. There can not be a worse chipping action than that playing comp golf in Aus. Even my nana pissed herself laughing when she saw it and she's 75, plays off 38 and has a titanium hip :lol:

Dennis
2nd June 2009, 06:32 PM
Pity they can't rank you for parts of your game. We could look at PY's chipping rank and it would tell us how many players are registered to golflink. There can not be a worse chipping action than that playing comp golf in Aus. Even my nana pissed herself laughing when she saw it and she's 75, plays off 38 and has a titanium hip :lol:

:smt038

It was the 60* wedge..not me

zacdullard
2nd June 2009, 06:38 PM
15.0 = 86172

sms316
2nd June 2009, 07:14 PM
I assume Golflink is prone to errors if you show a hcap of 0.1??

Probably not as much as you are prone to being a ****wit.

markTHEblake
2nd June 2009, 07:26 PM
Probably not as much as you are prone to being a ****wit.

we could do a ranking method for that.

Its actually quite scary to me to see how many golfers are playing off low numbers. When I was a young tacker, a 5 handicap got you into District and zone teams, and state schoolboy teams, and 2 would be State open teams.

Nowadays a 5 handicap is definitely B grade.

Having this ranking method of Golflink is a good idea, its fun to see where one stands in the scale of things. Doesnt really matter if it doesnt mean much. Also the National amateur rankings are on the Golf Australia site. Anybody that has played in GA point events will be listed.

sms316
2nd June 2009, 07:30 PM
Its actually quite scary to me to see how many golfers are playing off low numbers. When I was a young tacker, a 5 handicap got you into District and zone teams, and state schoolboy teams, and 2 would be State open teams.

Interesting.

My junior DGA team (only 6 clubs in the Murray DGA back then), the highest marker in the 7 player team was 1.

The current ACT junior team (which play in the Australian inter-state series) all play off 2-5.

Having said that, I am one of 2 in my junior side who is still an amateur. Marcus Fraser did OK I guess.:wink:

markTHEblake
2nd June 2009, 07:52 PM
The handicap system was different up until sometime mid-late 80's when the 15% CCR was introduced, and maybe some other things. Prior to that it was more difficult to get the handicap down (thats an IMHO) of course equipment and development are other factors too.

Tex
2nd June 2009, 07:56 PM
The handicap system was different up until sometime mid-late 80's when the 15% CCR was introduced, and maybe some other things. Prior to that it was more difficult to get the handicap down (thats an IMHO) of course equipment and development are other factors too.
DELETED (looks like it is 12.5%)
:smt108

markTHEblake
2nd June 2009, 08:05 PM
actually its 12.5% normally :oops:

Tex
2nd June 2009, 08:06 PM
LOL you must have checked when I did HA!

Moe Norman
2nd June 2009, 09:00 PM
Ranked 17326

henno
2nd June 2009, 09:00 PM
Henno: shouldn't the same exact h'cap have the same rank? How could they place one guy of 17.1 ahead of another off 17.1? Or am I missing something?

Good point. Would that mean that the ranking system would not be the most accurate indication of golflink member numbers? Or do you think they would work it like they do with other tied positions? (3 people on the same rank, so the next level will be three rankings higher.)

Tongueboy
2nd June 2009, 09:14 PM
13271 and nothing wrong with Stones. good poo!!

Scottt
2nd June 2009, 09:14 PM
Yeah. Like comp results. If you have a winner, then three guys tied 2nd, the guy behind them is 5th. Yeah?

Ned
2nd June 2009, 09:19 PM
I'd love to have a 36.4 handicap and play in a group with sms316!!!!!=P~

henno
2nd June 2009, 09:21 PM
Yeah. Like comp results. If you have a winner, then three guys tied 2nd, the guy behind them is 5th. Yeah?

I guess we'll never know, but yes it makes sense.

adlo
2nd June 2009, 09:27 PM
Scottt, yes, exactly like that.

Unless Golflink felt like rating every 17.1 capper based on personal preference :)

Dotty
2nd June 2009, 09:41 PM
19.6 ranked 147194.
New handicap and pushes in front of 100,000 regular golfers.

Grunt
3rd June 2009, 06:45 AM
Grunt H'cap 17.6 Rank 118823

less than a day and I have improved 27 places, with no golf played. I like this improving without doing anything bit :)

Rank 118796 http://www.golflink.com.au/images/icon/RankUp.gif27

Scottt
3rd June 2009, 06:47 AM
Keep doing nothing, Grunt. :lol:

sms316
3rd June 2009, 08:50 AM
I'd love to have a 36.4 handicap and play in a group with sms316!!!!!=P~
Best of luck, on both counts.
:wink:

Ned
3rd June 2009, 08:45 PM
I'd love to have a 36.4 handicap and play in a group with sms316!!!!!=P~


Best of luck, on both counts.:wink:

Never say never, an old hacker like myself could be handy!!!!!:mrgreen:

Lucasto23
3rd June 2009, 11:03 PM
15.3 has me at 89780 and i've just moved up 13 spots today

Eag's
3rd June 2009, 11:24 PM
11.7 gets me 45864 hey jarro what a shock, you and me on the same number, who would of picked it :lol:

Scottt
3rd June 2009, 11:32 PM
Very strange - went from 9.1 to 7.9 in a day and my ranking has changed a whole seven places!!

Daves
3rd June 2009, 11:47 PM
Very strange - went from 9.1 to 7.9 in a day and my ranking has changed a whole seven places!!

The ranking won't update till tomorrow I would think. The movement in your rank today would be solely because some of those ranked around your old handicap changed yesterday. The system only updates once a day, otherwise it would be a nightmare to maintain.

Bruce
4th June 2009, 09:22 AM
There is a bloke at my club off about 33. He's a smashing bloke and I hope I can be getting around as well as him at 85. He must be close to the worst ranking which will give an idea of how big the pool is.

Edit:

And in looking for him I found someone who hasn't played at all in the last few months so it clearly isn't the guy I was thinking of.
http://www.golflink.com.au/HandicapHistory.aspx?golflink_no=3190300058
Hcp - 36.4
Ranking - 256171

Fishman Dan
4th June 2009, 10:41 AM
pointless

Agree. Treating this system (soon to be outdated?) as a pissing contest.

FYI - 13.3 has me at 65971.

sms316
5th June 2009, 03:24 PM
Is this guy Australia's worst golfer?

http://www.golflink.com.au/HandicapHistory.aspx?golflink_no=2062501999

He's a member at Yowani. Is aged about 50, but looks like an 80 year old AIDS victim. Perhaps he has just "lived hard".

henno
5th June 2009, 03:29 PM
Wow. That sure makes me feel a lot better.

kpac
5th June 2009, 03:44 PM
Is this guy Australia's worst golfer?

http://www.golflink.com.au/HandicapHistory.aspx?golflink_no=2062501999

He's a member at Yowani. Is aged about 50, but looks like an 80 year old AIDS victim. Perhaps he has just "lived hard".

Consistent though.... Why would he put himself down to play the stroke event in march... surely when he's shooting 130+'s a stroke event is cruel. He's playing more golf than me though, so he's got something right.

sms316
5th June 2009, 03:52 PM
And the prick always plays in the first group of the arvo field. So why can't we get around in under 4hr 45mins?
:-k

markTHEblake
5th June 2009, 05:52 PM
Is this guy Australia's worst golfer?

He is very consistent, in fact he is probably the most consistent golfer i have ever seen, and with those high numbers that just has got to be hard to do.

ParMaster
5th June 2009, 06:03 PM
He is very consistent, in fact he is probably the most consistent golfer i have ever seen, and with those high numbers that just has got to be hard to do.

:lol:

LarryLong
5th June 2009, 07:24 PM
The key to consistency at that level is that you just need to be the sort of golfer who always gets up and down from anywhere in 5 shots.

:)

zigwah
5th June 2009, 07:56 PM
theres no way i could play a comp round with him, social golfs a different story.

I think there should be a test like getting you L's for driving about course etiquette would be less complaints cause you know someone is on their L's from behind. you ****ing hate it but say nothing cause you were there once too.

markTHEblake
5th June 2009, 09:57 PM
I think there should be a test like getting you L's for driving about course etiquette would be less complaints cause you know someone is on their L's from behind.

Good pioint, they have that in Germany. You need to be certified by a golf pro before being allowed on a course.

However just because a bloke averages 130 it doesnt mean he is slow or has poor ettiquette. I once played with a woman who had a 45 hcap, she couldnt hit a wood as far as my sand iron, yet she still played faster than most men.

AlexMc
5th June 2009, 11:39 PM
12.0 ranks at 49076.

AlexMc
5th June 2009, 11:43 PM
And as for the search for the Number 1 ranked player on Golflink...when the Lake Macquarie Amateur was on they were putting the score sheets up after every round with the players Golflink number on it - made for some interesting reading. I imagine if we could track that down again (couldn't see it on the Belmont website now) we'd go close to finding said Number 1...

ParMaster
6th June 2009, 12:01 AM
Alex i have that sheet. Lowest HCP i've found is +3.7 from Daniel Nisbet.

mike
6th June 2009, 12:21 AM
12.6 ranks me at 57206http://www.golflink.com.au/images/icon/RankDown.gif-12


wtf does http://www.golflink.com.au/images/icon/RankDown.gif-12 mean?

mike
6th June 2009, 12:23 AM
OK it means thats how many ranking spots I've dropped in the last 24 hours.

This is outrageous !

AlexMc
6th June 2009, 12:57 AM
Alex i have that sheet. Lowest HCP i've found is +3.7 from Daniel Nisbet.
So that means 1-6 aren't Australian Rep players then?

markTHEblake
6th June 2009, 01:14 AM
And as for the search for the Number 1 ranked player on Golflink...

It is Geoff Ogilvy.

got an email from Golflink today, and thats what they said. And Greg Norman is #24. Unfortunately they didnt tell us what his golf link no is.

Jarro
6th June 2009, 02:04 PM
11.7 = 45863

markTHEblake
6th June 2009, 11:19 PM
My handicap dropped by 0.2 today and my ranking improved by 2 places. Tough School.

apparently that was the previous day movement, the ranking updates overnight - the 0.2 dropped about 700 spots

ParMaster
6th June 2009, 11:57 PM
So that means 1-6 aren't Australian Rep players then?


The lowest i have found was +3.7. Clearly there can be lower.

And Mark im sure if you find out what ogilvys membership number is then you can find out what his golflink is. Ogilvy is a member of The Victoria Golf Club so if u find his membership number there u can find out his golflink number.

I think he plays off +5 there.

markTHEblake
17th June 2009, 08:24 PM
PM, if someone pays the Ozgolf Mates annual fee they could come across this information by digging around the comp result listings for the club. Otherwise no.

I have been a bit lucky the last couple of rounds, hcap went from 5.5 to 4.7, the national rank went from 10087 to 6963.

All i can say that means is that there is a lot of has beens chopping around off 5.
Have always said that any bum can play off 5, but not many can maintain a 4 handicap.

markTHEblake
17th June 2009, 09:01 PM
I cant help it, am addicted to statistics...:neutral:
- if you want too add/revise new numbers to it and pass it on.

-3.6 ---- 7
-3.0 ---- 20
-2.8 ---- 19
-2.7 ---- 28
-2.1 ---- 53
-1.7 ---- 70
-1.6 ---- 74
-0.5 ---- 225
00.1 ---- 1211
00.5 ---- 1383
01.1 ---- 1622
02.3 ---- 2331
02.9 ---- 2884
03.3 ---- 3362
04.1 ---- 4645
04.3 ---- 5289
04.6 ---- 6468
04.7 ---- 6963
05.3 ---- 9332
05.5 ---- 10087
07.7 ---- 18701
08.7 ---- 23781
09.1 ---- 25938
10.7 ---- 37000
11.4 ---- 42817
11.7 ---- 45864
12.0 ---- 49076
13.3 ---- 65971
14.4 ---- 79049
15.0 ---- 86172
15.3 ---- 89780
17.6 ---- 118823
19.6 ---- 147194
21.4 ---- 170015
31.7 ---- 246000
36.4 ---- 257354

ParMaster
17th June 2009, 09:10 PM
that must have taken some time to write MTB